RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02658
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her former spouses record be changed to show he elected former
spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
According to the terms of the court order and divorce decree,
she was awarded the continuance of the SBP annuity.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant and the former service member were married on
9 February 1971 and he elected spouse only SBP coverage based on
a reduced level of retired pay prior to his 1 May
1992 retirement.
The applicant and the former service member divorced on
30 October 1996.
Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) records
show the former service member married his second spouse on
14 February 1999 and she died on 17 June 1999. He married his
current spouse on 16 November 2002.
A copy of the AFBCMR marital status affidavits were forwarded to
the applicant and former service member on 2 July 2014, to
verify if either party has remarried (Exhibit B).
The applicant responded with a signed and notarized affidavit,
dated 8 July 2014, which indicates that she has not remarried
(Exhibit C).
The service member responded with a signed and notarized
affidavit, dated 29 July 2014, which indicates he is currently
married effective 16 November 2002 and his current spouse did
not complete a Release of Benefits (Exhibit C).
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPFFF makes no recommendation. DPFFF states there is no
evidence the applicant or service member submitted a valid
former spouse election during the required time following their
divorce.
The former member also did not notify the Defense Finance and
Accounting Service - Cleveland Center (DFAS-CL) of the change in
his current marital status or request that spouse coverage be
established on her behalf.
Premiums for SBP spouse coverage was suspended effective the
date of their divorce. The applicants current spouse became
the eligible spouse beneficiary by operation of the law on the
first anniversary of their marriage.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit D.
APPLICANTS REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant and former service member on 10 October 2014 for
review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date,
the applicant has not responded.
The former service member states that on 5 November 1996, he
notified DFAS of his divorce to his former spouse and the terms
of the divorce regarding SBP. In regards to his current spouse
- he believes he mailed copies of the marriage certificate to
both the VA and DFAS. He did not request SBP benefits for his
current spouse because he did not know that she was eligible.
He was unaware that his former spouse neglected to complete her
deemed election form in the required time frame.
The applicants complete response is at Exhibit F.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPFFF makes no recommendation. DPFFF was asked to relook
the case in light of additional documentation the applicant
provided.
On 4 November 1996, the applicant sent a fax to DFAS-CL, and
attached the first page of his divorce decree, requesting his
SBP be changed from spouse to former spouse coverage. On
5 November 1996 he sent a letter to DFAS notifying them of his
divorce and his former spouses eligibility to receive
50 percent of his retired pay and SBP. He also requested that
DFAS establish an account in his former spouses name to receive
benefits and to mail the documents for her to establish an
account. Upon receipt of the divorce decree, DFAS suspended the
spouses coverage, effective the date of divorce.
Unfortunately, his request to change from spouse to former
spouse coverage was invalid because he failed to complete a
DD Form 2656-1, SBP Election Statement for Former Spouse
Coverage, and he failed to provide a copy of the Property
Settlement Agreement, incorporated in the divorce decree, that
awarded his former spouse SBP coverage. There is no evidence
his former spouse submitted a request to the Defense Finance and
Accounting Service (DFAS) for former spouse coverage to be
deemed on her behalf within the first year following divorce.
The applicant claims he mailed a copy of his marriage
certificate to both the Veterans Administration and DFAS;
however, DFAS records do not reflect the current spouses name
as the spouse beneficiary, and SBP premiums were not reinstated.
It is not the VAs responsibility to notify DFAS of marital
status changes that could affect SBP eligibility. The member is
ultimately responsible for notifying DFAS of any marital status
changes, and when the status of an SBP beneficiary changes. His
current spouse became the eligible spouse beneficiary by
operation of the law on the first anniversary of their marriage.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit G.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant and former service member on 27 February 2015 for
review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit H). As of this date,
no response has been received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. While we
acknowledge the applicants assertion that an addendum to a
stipulation of judgment for divorce ordered that SBP benefits be
paid to her as the former spouse, she failed to convert the
coverage to former spouse coverage within one year of their
divorce as required by law. However, in this case, the
applicant has indicated that there is a potential competing
interest for SBP benefits as her former spouse remarried. The
AFBCMR has consistently refused to grant similar applications
where there is a spouse with a legal entitlement to this
benefit, unless that spouse relinquishes his/her right to this
entitlement in a notarized statement. Therefore, absent the
consent of the former members spouse, we do not find there are
extraordinary circumstances here that would cause us to render a
determination that would serve to extinguish the legal rights of
another party in contravention of our long-standing practice in
similar cases. Therefore, because such an action would deprive
the former members spouse of a legal entitlement, granting the
application is not appropriate in these circumstances.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-02658 in Executive Session on 23 July 2015, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-02658 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 June 2014, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letters, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 July 2014.
Exhibit C. Affidavits, Applicant, dated 8 July 2014 and
Service Member, dated 29 July 2014.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPFFF, dated 19 August 2014.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 October 2014.
Exhibit F. Letter, Service Member, dated 1 November 2014,
w/atchs.
Exhibit G. Letter, AFPC/DPFFF, dated 2 February 2015.
Exhibit H. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 February 2015.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05896
Also, there is no evidence DFAS received a request from the applicant deeming a SBP election during the first year following the divorce. Subsequently, on 14 September 2012, a second DD Form 2656-10 was forwarded to DFAS; however, DFAS did not honor the applicants request because the 16 June 2011 court order was dated after the members retirement date. The member elected SBP coverage for his former spouse a month prior to establishing SBP coverage for his current spouse.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02386
In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of the former members death certificate, divorce decree, Separation and Property Settlement Agreement, marital status affidavit and various other documents associated with her request. None of the documents the applicant provided (Separation and Property Agreement or QDRO) had language that would entitle her to deem former spouse SBP coverage. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Her attorney submitted...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01845
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01845 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be designated the former spouse beneficiary on his former wifes Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The letter informed the applicant that his former spouse supplied documentation on 30 Oct 12 electing former spouse coverage but the documentation was insufficient and the application could not be processed. THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01582
The Board should consider it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application as it would be a great injustice if his former spouses present spouse were to die or they were to divorce and she were not entitled to the SBP again. The applicant and his former spouse were married on 21 Aug 71 and he elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay prior to his 1 Aug 91 retirement. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jul 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00389
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00389 COUNSEL: NONE (DECEASED SERVICE MEMBER) HEARING DESIRED: NO (APPLICANT) APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased former spouses records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), naming her as the former spouse beneficiary. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01662
However, there is no evidence either party submitted a valid former spouse election within the first year following the divorce, as the law requires. The applicant has not demonstrated that extraordinary circumstances exist as required for this Board to grant relief in cases of competing SBP beneficiaries. Since it appears the former service members second spouse gained entitlement to the benefit by operation of law, and there has been no showing of extraordinary circumstances, we are...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00712
A person's eligibility as an SBP spouse beneficiary terminates upon divorce; however, the law provides two mechanisms for changing spouse coverage to former spouse coverage. The court order awarded the applicant the SBP and DFAS-CL records continued to reflect the applicants name as the eligible spouse beneficiary and SBP premiums continued to be deducted from the member's retired pay until his 14 Oct 13 death. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03972
In the Separation and Property Settlement Agreement, which was incorporated in the divorce decree, the former service member agreed the applicant would receive the former spouse annuity. There is no evidence the former service member or the applicant submitted a valid election for former spouse coverage within one year following their divorce as required by law. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, based on the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05605
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05605 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to void his election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). If the service member voluntarily files an election for former spouse coverage, a request to change that election to spouse coverage may be made at any time after the service member remarries. As the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04458
His former spouse has been receiving a portion of his military retirement and remained eligible to be the beneficiary of his SBP up until her subsequent marriage. The correct date of marriage is 7 Dec 04. Neither the applicant nor his current spouse dispute the fact that his first former spouse is the rightful beneficiary of the SBP.